Keith Schembri And Minister Konrad Mizzi Begin Proceedings To Dethrone Galizia’s Credibility6/7/2017 Upon the tumultuous inevitability of all proceedings regarding Panama data leaks, Minister Konrad Mizzi and Prime Minister Muscat’s Chief of Staff Keith Schembri have revealed, on separate occasions, a viable institution of libel proceedings against the controversial journalist and blogger Daphne Caruana Galizia. In recent findings, Schembri’s legal team has found suitable evidence to mount a strong suit against the blogger, who has regularly instigated a chain of false allegations against the Chief of Staff and Konrad Mizzi simultaneously. Since the Panama data scandal surfaced on digital shores of social media servers, there has been a lot to speculate regarding the authenticity of the defaulters’ record. It seems as if the Maltese government is on course to defy the odds and remedy its status as a staunch follower of the book of law. In a similar set of proceedings, Minister Konrad Mizzi has laughed off Caruana Galizia’s insubordinate accusations regarding viable connections to money embezzlements schemes; he has denied corporate counterfeiting in the line of business outside Malta and does not believe in any kind of money transfer, be that as it may, Heanville Inc. involvement regarding the matter hold no importance in the Minister’s mind. In a statement preceding similar allegations, Prime Minister Muscat’s Chief of Staff has also denied all falsified evidence against him.
He has urged the Courts to take action against Caruana Galizia in accordance with the libel suit he intends to file against the notorious blogger. The Chief of Staff argues that if the Ms Galizia is certain of her findings regarding the matter, then she would have no problem with appearing before the court and attempt to prove Keith Schembri wrong (which seems impossible). It is evident that necessary evidence is required to be presented before the Court of appeals to remedy the situation and balance off the tumult of accusatory remarks both parties have been exchanging since the advent of the entire farcical controversy. In order to substantiate any evidence in compliance to any case at hand, one should be able to present the required ammo of information to help the authorities reach the necessary verdict. We are aware of the fact that action speaks louder than words; why apply the philosophical sanctity of linguistic digitalization in attempts to out-manoeuvre certain aspects of the integrity of the one being accused? Immoral, illogical and ill-based interpretation of information, for the sake of character-assassination stands for no solid grounds in the court of law. Galizia must realize the insubordinate stupidity of her statements, and henceforth must appear before the Court to speak on behalf of all the allegations that she has so tactfully crafted. Truth speaks volumes; one must know the difference!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |